Most subscription teams can describe their sign-up page in detail. Fewer can say what happens, screen by screen, when a customer tries to leave. That second path is where federal enforcers, state laws and card networks have all written requirements.
This post sets out what each source says a cancellation flow has to offer, using the statute and rule text. It explains what the sources say. Which of them apply to a given business is a question for counsel.
Cancellation requirements at a glance
Cancellation requirements sit in one federal statute, a set of state laws and the card networks' own rules, and each is worded differently.
The table lists the sources read for this post and the short version of what each says about cancelling. Every row is explained in the sections below.
Two cautions apply. State coverage here is a sample of four statutes, and Benesch, a law firm, counted 28 states and the District of Columbia with automatic-renewal laws or regulations as of 14 August 2026. Card-network rules reach a merchant through its acquirer agreement, which is separate from the statutes.
| Source | What it says about cancelling | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ROSCA, 15 U.S.C. 8403 | Provide 'simple mechanisms' for a consumer to stop recurring charges | In force since 2010; applies to internet sales with a negative option feature |
| FTC enforcement policy statement (2021) | Cancellation at least as easy as sign-up, through the same medium | Guidance on how the FTC reads ROSCA and the FTC Act |
| FTC click-to-cancel amendments | Would have required a simple cancellation mechanism by rule | Vacated 8 July 2025; not in force |
| California Bus. and Prof. Code 17602 | Online termination for online sign-ups; same medium; limits on save offers | Amendments apply to contracts made, amended or extended on or after 1 July 2025 |
| New York Gen. Bus. Law 527-a | As easy as consent, same medium, through every medium that takes sign-ups | Text as updated 7 November 2025 |
| Virginia Code 59.1-207.46 | At least as easy as sign-up; no forced contact with an agent | History note lists 2026 amendments |
| Minnesota Statutes 325G.60 | A 'termination election' on the website | Enacted 2024 |
| Visa Rules, section 5.8.11.1 | Simple cancellation procedure, and at least an online one for online orders | Public edition dated 24 October 2026 |
What does federal law require for cancelling a subscription?
ROSCA requires 'simple mechanisms' for a consumer to stop recurring charges, and the statute stops there.
The Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act makes it unlawful to charge a consumer for goods or services sold online through a negative option feature unless the seller does three things. The third is to provide simple mechanisms for the consumer to stop recurring charges. The statute does not say what counts as simple.
The FTC filled that gap with guidance. Its enforcement policy statement, published in the Federal Register on 4 November 2021, says sellers should provide cancellation mechanisms at least as easy to use as the method the consumer used to sign up. It says the mechanism should be available at least through the same medium, such as the same website or app. If a seller also offers phone cancellation, the statement says calls should be answered during normal business hours.
The FTC then tried to turn this into a rule. The FTC's own later notice records that the Eighth Circuit vacated the amended Negative Option Rule on 8 July 2025, holding that the Commission had failed to conduct a preliminary regulatory analysis required by section 22 of the FTC Act. That notice, published on 13 March 2026, opened a new proceeding, and comments closed on 13 April 2026. We found no proposed rule as of 12 November 2026.
Enforcement under the statute continued. The FTC's September 2025 order against Amazon, as the agency describes it, requires an easy way to cancel Prime using the same method consumers used to sign up, and says the process cannot be difficult, costly or time-consuming.
What does California require of an online cancel flow?
California requires that a customer who accepted an offer online can terminate it exclusively online, at will, without steps that obstruct or delay.
Section 17602(d) of the Business and Professions Code sets the online rule. The business must provide a prominently located direct link or button, which may sit in the account, profile or settings, or an immediately accessible termination email that the customer can send without adding information. The business may ask a customer who has an account to log in first.
Section 17602(c) covers other channels. A business must offer a toll-free number, an email address, a postal address if it bills directly, or another cost-effective, timely and easy-to-use mechanism. If it takes cancellations by phone, it must answer calls promptly during normal business hours. A voicemail asking to cancel must be processed, or returned, within one business day.
Section 17602(f) adds the same-medium rule. The ability to cancel must be available in the medium the customer used to sign up, or the one in which the customer is accustomed to interacting with the business. These amendments apply only to contracts entered into, amended or extended on or after 1 July 2025.
- A direct cancel link or button that is prominently located, or a pre-formatted termination email
- No further steps that obstruct or delay immediate termination
- Login or other authentication allowed, with an offline route for a customer who cannot authenticate
- Phone lines answered promptly in business hours where phone cancellation is offered
- Cancellation available in the medium used to sign up
Are save offers allowed when a customer tries to cancel?
California and New York both allow a retention offer, on the condition that it does not block or delay the cancellation.
California's section 17602(e) says that showing a discount, a retention benefit or information about the effect of cancelling is not an obstruction, provided the customer remains able to cancel. Online, the offer must appear together with a prominently located and continuously displayed direct link or button entitled 'click to cancel' or similar words. If the customer uses that button, the business must process the cancellation promptly.
By phone, the California text requires the business first to tell the customer that they can complete the cancellation at any time by saying they want to cancel. Once the customer says so, the business must process it promptly.
New York's statute is close. It allows a discounted offer, a retention benefit or information about the effect of cancelling, and it forbids unreasonable conditions on the customer's ability to cancel. It lists examples: hanging up on people who call to cancel, giving false information about how to cancel, and misrepresenting the consequences or costs of cancelling.
The FTC's 2021 statement draws a similar line in a footnote. One request to consider an offer would not be an unreasonable delay. Multiple requests, lengthy pitches or ignoring a request to decline further offers could be. The FTC's 2026 notice asks the public what effect state laws on save attempts have had, so this area may change.
What do New York, Virginia and Minnesota add?
Each adds its own test: New York looks at ease and medium, Virginia bars forced contact with an agent, and Minnesota requires a termination election on the website.
New York's General Business Law section 527-a makes it unlawful to fail to offer cancellation through a simple mechanism that is as easy to use as the one used to give consent, through the same medium. A second paragraph requires cancellation through all the mediums by which the business accepts consent. Where consent was given in person, the business must at least offer an online mechanism or a phone number.
Virginia's section 59.1-207.46 requires a cost-effective, timely and easy-to-use mechanism that is at least as easy as the one used to sign up. No consumer may be required to interact with a live or virtual agent to cancel, unless the seller only takes sign-ups that way. A cancellation phone line must not cost more to use than the sign-up method, and the seller may not charge for the call.
Minnesota's statutes use different vocabulary. A seller whose website has profile or subscription management must include a termination election there, in plain language, asking only for the information needed to process it. The statute defines a termination election as a simple and easily accessible way to give notice quickly, without undue complexity, confusion or misrepresentation by the seller.
| Point | California | New York | Virginia | Minnesota |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Online cancel for online sign-up | Yes, exclusively online | Yes, same medium as consent | Yes, each method used to sign up | Termination election on the website |
| Ease standard | No steps that obstruct or delay | As easy as giving consent | At least as easy as sign-up | Simple, easily accessible, no undue complexity |
| Agent contact | Not addressed in those words | Not addressed in those words | Cannot be required, with one exception | Not addressed in those words |
| Save offers | Allowed with a visible cancel button | Allowed without unreasonable conditions | Not addressed in the section read | Not addressed in the sections read |
| Phone cancellation | Answer promptly; voicemail within one business day | Hanging up listed as unlawful | No cost for the call | Not addressed in the sections read |
What do Visa and Mastercard require?
Both networks expect an online way to cancel, and the dispute process is where a missing one tends to show up.
Visa's public rules, in the edition dated 24 October 2026, say a merchant that processes recurring transactions must provide a simple cancellation procedure and, if the cardholder's order was initially accepted online, at least an online cancellation procedure. The same table requires a notice at least seven days before a recurring transaction when a trial or promotional period is about to end, with a link or other simple way to cancel online or by text message.
Mastercard's public summary of its subscription standards, dated November 2022, lists five requirements and recommendations for merchants. One is to provide an online cancellation method. The others cover transparency at enrollment, a confirmation email, a receipt after every billing and a notice before annual billings.
The practical consequence shows up in disputes. Visa's dispute guide for merchants describes condition 13.2, cancelled recurring transaction, as a claim that the merchant kept charging after the cardholder cancelled. Charges processed after a valid cancellation are, in the guide's words, typically considered invalid.
What should happen after the customer clicks cancel?
The sources point to three things: process the request promptly, tell the customer when it takes effect and stop billing after that date.
California's text requires prompt processing once the customer uses the cancel button or says the word on a call. The statutes read for this post do not prescribe a confirmation message after cancellation, and they say little about what the customer should be told next.
Visa's dispute guide does recommend one. Its prevention list for condition 13.2 tells merchants to confirm the cancellation in writing by email or SMS with the effective date, to say clearly what the last day of service is, and to stop billing immediately after the effective cancellation date. It also says to keep clear records of all cancellation requests, confirmations and service usage.
Questions to ask about your own cancel flow
A review can start from the questions the statutes themselves pose, applied to each channel through which you take sign-ups.
The list below turns the provisions described above into questions. It is a reading aid drawn from four state statutes, one federal statute and two card networks. It does not cover every state, and it does not tell you which laws apply to your subscribers.
- Can a customer who signed up online finish cancelling online, without a call or a chat?
- Is the cancel link or button prominent in the account or settings area?
- If a save offer appears, is a cancel button on the same screen the whole time?
- Does every channel that takes sign-ups also take cancellations?
- Is a cancellation phone line answered in business hours, and are voicemails handled within a business day?
- Does the customer get a written confirmation with the effective date?
- Does billing stop after that date, and can you show it?
- Do you keep a dated record of each request and of the flow as it looked that day?
Common questions
Is there a federal click-to-cancel rule in force?
No. The Eighth Circuit vacated the FTC's amended Negative Option Rule on 8 July 2025. The FTC published an advance notice of a new rulemaking on 13 March 2026, and we found no proposed rule as of 12 November 2026. ROSCA, the statute, remains in force.
Does a subscription need an online cancel button?
In California, a business that lets a consumer accept an offer online must let them terminate exclusively online, through a prominent link or button or a ready-made termination email. New York and Virginia require cancellation through the medium used to sign up. Visa's rules require at least an online cancellation procedure when the order was accepted online.
Can I require a phone call to cancel?
The statutes read here point away from that for online sign-ups. California requires an exclusively online route, and Virginia says a consumer cannot be required to interact with a live or virtual agent unless the seller only takes sign-ups that way. Ask counsel how the laws of your subscribers' states treat your flow.
Can I show a discount before the cancellation completes?
California permits it online if a 'click to cancel' button is displayed prominently and continuously with the offer. New York permits a retention offer that does not obstruct or unreasonably delay the cancellation. The FTC's 2021 statement treats repeated offers and lengthy pitches as a possible unreasonable delay.
Can I ask the customer to log in before cancelling?
California's statute allows a business to require account information or other online authentication if the consumer has an account. It adds that a consumer who is unwilling or unable to authenticate must not be prevented from cancelling offline by another method.
Do these requirements apply to business customers?
California's definition of consumer covers individuals buying for personal, family or household purposes. Benesch reports that Virginia's recent amendments allow small businesses to recover as consumers, and says this may lead to suits over business subscriptions. Read the definition of consumer in each state's statute before assuming a business plan is outside it.
Does this post cover every state?
No. It reads four state statutes in full and relies on a law firm's count for the rest. Benesch counted 28 states and the District of Columbia with automatic-renewal laws or regulations as of 14 August 2026, and their details differ. Check the statute for each state where you have subscribers.
Reviewed November 13, 2026
Consentra is software. Nothing on this site is legal advice, and using Consentra does not by itself make a business compliant with any law or carrier rule. Whether a rule applies to your business is a question for your counsel.
Sources
- Legal Information Institute: 15 U.S.C. 8403, Negative option marketing on the Internet (enacted 29 December 2010)
- Federal Register: FTC Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Negative Option Marketing (4 November 2021)
- Federal Register: Rule Concerning the Use of Prenotification Negative Option Plans, advance notice of proposed rulemaking (13 March 2026)
- Federal Trade Commission: FTC Secures Historic 2.5 Billion Dollar Settlement Against Amazon (25 September 2025)
- California.Public.Law: California Business and Professions Code section 17602, statute text (verified 11 November 2026)
- NewYork.Public.Law: New York General Business Law section 527-a, statute text (updated 7 November 2025)
- Virginia Legislative Information System: Code of Virginia section 59.1-207.46 (history through 2026)
- Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes: Minnesota Statutes section 325G.60, termination election (2024)
- Visa: Visa Core Rules and Visa Product and Service Rules, public edition (24 October 2026)
- Visa: Visa Dispute Management Guide for Merchants (October 2026)
- Mastercard: Greater Transparency for Cardholders, modified requirements for subscription and negative option billing models (November 2022)
- Benesch: The coming state-law litigation wave of 2026-27, subscription trap class actions (14 August 2026)
